Who Wins The Race For Air Dominance? US vs China and Global Powers
For a long time, the United States didn’t have to think about controlling the skies; it was simply a given. But those days are likely over, as another global power is quickly catching up. The question everyone is now asking is, who wins the race for air dominance?
China is pouring incredible resources into its air force, modernizing its capabilities faster than many predicted. This rapid development makes understanding who wins the race for air dominance more critical than ever for global security. The competition is heating up, and the stakes could not be higher.
Table of Contents:
- The US Bets on Next-Generation Tech
- China’s Rapid Rise in Airpower
- Who Wins the Race for Air Dominance in the Pacific?
- The Real Battle Might Be on the Ground
- Conclusion
The US Bets on Next-Generation Tech
The U.S. military is not sitting idle while its lead narrows. Instead, it’s making a significant bet on revolutionary technology. The objective is to field a force that is smaller but vastly more intelligent, networked, and lethal.
The NGAD: America’s Future Fighter Program
At the center of this strategy is the Next-Generation Air Dominance, or NGAD, program. After a brief pause, the Air Force is moving forward with its plans for this sixth-generation fighter. The service is expected to make a source selection for the prime contract soon, a decision that will shape the future of American air power.
The NGAD program is much more than just a new combat jet; it represents an entire family of systems. The manned fighter component of the NGAD program will be the centerpiece, designed to operate with or without a pilot onboard. This next-generation air dominance platform will act as the quarterback of the sky, networking with other assets like drones and bombers, and a full engineering and manufacturing development EMD contract is on the horizon.
This sixth-gen fighter represents a huge leap in combat aircraft technology. Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has stated the service plans to procure 200 of the NGAD fighter aircraft and 1,000 Collaborative Combat Aircraft. The first flight of a test aircraft is anticipated around 2028, signaling a new era of tactical air power.
The B-21 Raider: Ghost in the Machine
Just as important to the future force is the new B-21 Raider stealth bomber. This aircraft is being built with extreme stealth capabilities. Its primary mission is long-range strike, allowing it to fly deep into contested airspace without being detected by sophisticated enemy defenses.
The Air Force’s new bomber is currently undergoing rigorous testing at Edwards Air Force Base. The service plans to buy at least 100 of these bombers to replace its aging B-1 and B-2 fleets. The B-21 is America’s direct answer to the growing anti-access/area-denial challenges posed by China.
Loyal Wingmen are Changing the Game
Perhaps the most significant shift in U.S. strategy is the massive investment in drones. The Pentagon is spending billions on Collaborative Combat Aircraft, or CCAs. These can be thought of as advanced, autonomous wingmen for our human pilots.
These are not the drones used for surveillance over the past two decades. CCAs are designed for high-end conflict, flying alongside a manned fighter to carry extra weapons, sensors, and electronic warfare pods. This approach, championed by Air Force Secretary Frank, allows a single pilot to control a small number of these drones, effectively multiplying their combat mass and capabilities.
Companies like Anduril, General Atomics, and Boeing have already flown prototypes, proving the concept is rapidly becoming a reality. These Collaborative Combat platforms are a core component of the future tactical air strategy. The Air Force contracts for this technology maturation signal a serious commitment to this new form of air power.
China’s Rapid Rise in Airpower
While the U.S. pursues high-tech, networked systems, China has been focused on rapidly building its own air force. Their progress over the last decade has been stunning. They have worked tirelessly to close the technological gaps that previously held their combat air capabilities back.
The J-20 Mighty Dragon Gets a New Heart
China’s premier stealth fighter is the Chengdu J-20. For years, its greatest limitation was its reliance on older Russian-designed engines. That critical weakness is now being addressed.
The J-20 is being equipped with a powerful new domestic engine, the WS-15. This engine represents a monumental step forward for China’s aerospace industry. According to Pentagon assessments, it helps close the performance gap with American fighters like the F-22 and F-35, particularly in areas like speed and maneuverability.
Even with the new engine, many experts believe the U.S. retains an edge in stealth technology. The J-20’s design features, such as its canards and engine nozzle shape, may compromise its all-aspect stealth compared to America’s fifth-generation fighter aircraft. However, the J-20 remains a formidable threat, especially when deployed in large numbers.
Aircraft Carriers: Projecting Power at Sea
China’s ambitions extend well beyond its shores. The country recently launched its third aircraft carrier, the Fujian. This vessel is their most advanced carrier to date and marks a major leap in their ability to project power.
What makes the Fujian so significant are its electromagnetic catapults, a technology previously unique to the U.S. Navy’s newest carriers. This system allows the Fujian to launch heavier and more capable combat aircraft, such as the new J-35 stealth fighter. This gives China a carrier air wing that looks increasingly similar to its American counterparts.
This development is crucial for China’s goal of becoming a true blue-water navy. It extends the reach of their tactical air power far into the Pacific. The integration of these new carriers with their growing fleet of destroyers and submarines creates a multi-layered challenge for U.S. and allied forces.
Who Wins the Race for Air Dominance in the Pacific?
Both nations are building formidable air forces, but they are following distinctly different philosophies. The U.S. strategy is centered on quality and networking. The plan depends on a distributed network of highly advanced platforms and drones capable of striking with precision from extended ranges.
China’s strategy, conversely, leans heavily on quantity. They are mass-producing fighter jets, ships, and missiles at an impressive rate. Their objective appears to be overwhelming an adversary with sheer numbers, a classic military doctrine that could prove highly effective in a regional conflict.
The Tyranny of Distance
The most significant challenge for the U.S. is geography. The Pacific Ocean is vast. To effectively intervene in a scenario over Taiwan, U.S. jets need to operate from bases that are relatively close, but major hubs in Japan, Okinawa, and Guam are all within the range of China’s massive arsenal of ballistic and cruise missiles.
This is a critical vulnerability that China has deliberately exploited. Mark Cancian, a senior advisor at CSIS, has noted that in numerous wargames, simulated Chinese missile strikes often devastate these forward bases. Hundreds of U.S. aircraft can be destroyed on the ground before they even have a chance to join the fight.
This potent missile threat is precisely why China invested so heavily in its rocket forces. They understood that challenging the U.S. Air Force head-on in traditional dogfights early in a conflict would be difficult. So they developed an anti-access/area-denial strategy to ground American air power by targeting its bases, a strategy that could decide the opening phase of any conflict.
The integration of intelligence from space forces is also critical here. As noted in publications like Space Forces Magazine, satellite reconnaissance gives China the ability to monitor U.S. bases and troop movements. This information is vital for targeting their long-range missile strikes effectively.
| Country | Key Fighter Program | Key Bomber Program | Drone Strategy | Overall Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | NGAD (6th Gen) | B-21 Raider (Stealth) | Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs) | Networked, high-tech, quality over quantity |
| China | J-20 (5th Gen) | H-20 (In Development) | Large inventory, focus on swarms | Mass production, overwhelming numbers, anti-access |
The Real Battle Might Be on the Ground
This leads to a sobering realization: the future of generation air dominance might not be decided in high-speed aerial combat. It may be won or lost based on which side can better protect its air bases from attack. It is a battle of logistics and resilience.
Experts have been sounding the alarm on this issue for years. China is building hardened aircraft shelters across its coastal airfields to protect its planes. They routinely practice rapid runway repair and dispersal operations, preparing for a potential missile exchange.
The U.S., by contrast, has been slower to adapt its Pacific basing posture. Many analysts have called this a critical failure. On numerous key bases, our expensive and sophisticated aircraft sit in the open, making them vulnerable targets for a preemptive strike.
If a conflict were to begin today, China would likely hold an advantage in the initial days. Their missile salvos could create widespread chaos for U.S. forces, degrading command and control and destroying valuable assets on the ground. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin has repeatedly emphasized the need for a more resilient and agile basing strategy to counter this threat.
The ability to absorb that first blow and continue to operate is paramount. We need to be able to protect our aircraft on the ground through hardening and dispersal. This means investing in shelters and developing the ability to operate from smaller, more austere airfields across the region.
Conclusion
The era of unquestioned American air superiority has concluded. China has closed the technological and numerical gaps faster than anyone anticipated. They have built a powerful and modern air force specifically designed to challenge the U.S. in the Pacific.
The U.S. is responding with a technological revolution, pushing forward with incredible systems like the NGAD fighter and the B-21 bomber. But technology alone may not be enough to secure victory. The crucial factor determining who wins the race for air dominance might come down to something far less glamorous: survivability and logistics.
Protecting our aircraft on the ground and building a more resilient and distributed force will be the defining challenge of this generation. The competition for the skies is a race America cannot afford to lose. The outcome will likely determine the balance of power for decades to come.
Want more military info? Find your nearest military recruiter here!